Program People Courses Calendar

COURSES 11/12 First Year Advanced NCCR Courses Workshop Seminars > Evaluation Form Archive		EVALUATION - Doctoral Course Course Evaluation Form   (download) Thank you in advance for helping us to improve forthcoming doctoral courses by filling out this evaluation form. Please send the form to Mrs. Franziska Spycher (franziska.spycher[at]bf.uzh.ch). The overall results will be reported to the lecturer. You can also fill out the evaluation form online Topic: Lecturer: Date & Place: 1. Summary Evaluation Overall Rating of the Ph.D. course: excellent good sufficient poor very poor Would you recommend to run this Ph.D. course regularly (e.g. at annual intervals)? yes no Would you take another course by this lecturer? yes no 2. How do you rate the Ph.D. course? Quality of Content: very good good sufficient insufficient totally insufficient Terms of Content: way too theoretical too theoretical right balance too applied and non-theoretical way too applied and non-theoretical Practical Relevance: strong partial weak none Level: much too high too high appropriate too low much too low Duration: too short appropriate too long to be canceled Workload: much too heavy too heavy appropriate too light no workload Material handed out: very useful useful not useful no material 3. How do you rate the lecturer with regard to his/her methodological techniques and his/her general attitude/behavior/way of acting? Overall structure: very good good satisfactory poor very poor Overall teaching style: very good good satisfactory poor very poor Clarity understandability: very good good satisfactory poor very poor Was class stimulating: very much much sufficiently mostly insufficiently not at all Was lecture well prepared: very well well sufficiently mostly insufficiently not at all Response to participants: very good good satisfactory poor very poor Did class provide support for your research: very much much sufficiently mostly insufficiently not at all 4. Was the course helpful for improving your skills in topics not directly related to your future research but nevertheless important for grasping the main themes and big picture in academic finance? 5. In addition to the topics the instructor covered, which other topics would you say should be covered (or covered more intensively)? 6. Recommendation for improvements: 7. Any Additional Remarks: Thank you very much for your cooperation!
		© University of Zurich, , Impressum